30
May
Is screen printing becoming less and less of an industry standard? Many custom clothing companies are reconsidering their production options in light of the growing popularity of Direct-to-Film (DTF) printing. With less setup, fewer restrictions, and quicker turnaround times, DTF promises excellent results. That is revolutionary for small businesses and on-demand producers.
But it wasn't by accident that screen printing dominated the market for decades. Durability, bulk efficiency, and special effects that continue to outperform the majority of digital methods make it a reliable choice. One question keeps coming up as more companies compare the dependability of screen printing with the convenience of DTF: Can DTF truly replace screen printing, or is it just another tool in the print toolbox?
Screen printing: What Is It? One of the earliest and most popular printing techniques in the custom clothing sector is screen printing. Even though it was first used in the middle of the 20th century, it is still the preferred technique for printing a wide range of custom clothing, including corporate uniforms, band merch, and other large orders of branded clothing.
Making a stencil, also known as a screen, for every color in the provided design is the first step in the process. Once the screen is made, a squeegee is used to push ink through the mesh screen and onto the fabric. To create the final image, each layer is applied one at a time, heated to cure, and then precisely aligned.
Now, while this process is painstakingly tedious and labor-intensive, the payoff is undeniably consistent. At the end, you're left with vibrant prints that hold up extremely well over time, no matter the conditions.
Screen printing stands out for its bold color output, durability, and ability to handle large production runs efficiently. It also supports specialty inks and effects that aren't easily replicated by newer digital methods.
Pros
Cons
The digital transfer technique known as DTF printing has become popular due to its ease of use and adaptability. Using specialist inks, a design is first printed onto a clear PET film. The ink is covered with a powdered heat-activated adhesive after printing.
A heat press is then used to transfer the film onto the garment after it has been heated to cure. DTF eliminates the need for screens and color separations, in contrast to conventional techniques. This makes it a good choice for quick, adaptable printing, particularly for small batches or multi-color designs. It performs admirably on a variety of textiles, such as blends, cotton, and polyester.
Pros
Cons
DTF requires little to no setup. You print the design digitally and transfer it. Screen printing, by contrast, needs screens, stencils, and alignment, making setup slower and more manual.
For small runs and one-off designs, DTF is more affordable since it doesn't require extra tools or labor. Screen printing becomes more cost-effective only at high volumes, where the initial setup cost is spread across many units.
DTF excels at full-color, high-resolution prints and gradients. Screen printing handles solid colors well, but multi-color designs demand more screens and setup time, limiting efficiency for complex artwork.
Screen printing remains the most durable, often lasting the life of the garment. DTF holds up well, but prints may crack or peel over time if not applied or cared for properly.
DTF works on a wide range of fabrics, including cotton, polyester, and blends. Screen printing also handles various materials, but it often requires fabric-specific inks to get optimal results.
Screen printing offers a broad variety of effects like puff, glitter, and glow-in-the-dark. DTF is still catching up in this area and currently offers fewer specialty finishes.
DTF printers require frequent maintenance, especially for the white ink system. Screen printing requires cleaning and reclaiming screens, but it tends to have fewer daily operational issues.
DTF relies on plastic films and adhesive powders, which contribute to more waste. Screen printing, particularly when using water-based inks, can be a more sustainable option with reusable screens and lower material waste.
Nowadays, many print companies use both screen printing and DTF, rather than just one. Particularly among creators who value speed, customization, and multicolored designs without the overhead, DTF has established a solid niche for itself in the small business and custom merch markets.
At the same time, large-scale production is still dominated by screen printing. It is the preferred option for large orders, uniforms, and long-term retail lines due to its affordable price per unit, robustness, and variety of special effects. The majority of prosperous stores are implementing a hybrid workflow.
Screen printing does the heavy lifting for bulk jobs and textured finishes, while DTF is used for one-offs, short runs, and personalization (such as names and numbers on jerseys). This two-pronged strategy provides flexibility, better turnaround, and optimized cost across different types of orders.
DTF is a strong contender as it is great for short runs, detailed designs, and printing across fabric types with minimal setup. It's ideal for custom merch and small-batch jobs. DTF is highly preferred for small to medium-sized print houses, but screen printing still leads in durability, cost efficiency for bulk orders, and special effects. It remains the go-to for large-scale production.
DTF isn't replacing screen printing yet on a global scale. It's just complementing it. The smartest print shops use both, choosing the right method for each job.